freelancewriter
User
Platinum Boarder
| Posts: 91 |  |
|
Re:GOT/Campaigner Headers - 2007/07/05 01:08
Thanks for the reply, Jeremy. I have more faith in an ESP willing to reply than one that isn't. Many others have been strangely silent.
jsaibil wrote:
Got Corporation's products only sign mail with Domain Keys to destination domains that will benefit from the signature.( ie: Yahoo properties for participation in their FBL).
This raises the question of how DomainKeys and DKIM will be used. My (admittedly limited) understanding is any ISP, including corporate recipients, could as recipients use DomainKeys/DKIM as part of their spam filtering algorithms or in other ways to decide if an e-mail would be let through.
I personally would feel more confident in an ESP signing all outgoing messages with DomainKeys and DKIM. It's a reputation-builder at best, and at worst it does no harm. Plus, from the ESPs standpoint, it's a marketing bullet point :)
Aside from the ability to sign the volume of messages that go out and any hardware/software upgrades that go with that (an investment well made given the IETF approval of DKIM), I don't really see a direct cost to the method.
If it was a cost-per-message item such as Goodmail, I could see restricting it to certain domains.
We'll be rolling out the unsubscribe header in the near future, hopefully when there is more client side support.
Great to hear! Another item where I can't really see any harm in ESPs making this addition, plus potential benefits in terms of deliverability and marketing.
---------------------------------
Hats off to these ESPs that have
openly posted on this forum:
- Bronto
- Emma
- ExactTarget
- Gold Lasso
- GOT Corporation (Campaigner)
- iContact |
Dot Email Forums
